Blogs

Editor's Blog

MT editor Matthew Gwyther's take on the burning business issues of the day.

Editor's blog: Advertising in a global meerkat   

When times are bad, the money you spend on your marketing and advertising should be made to work even harder. The pain any organisation must feel at handing over hundreds of thousands of pounds to ITV or Sky, while laying off staff and slashing the R&D budget, is enough to make most FDs weep. But it has to be done – pity the fool who loses market share during a downturn because he stopped marketing.

But looking at the sad array of 30 second spots during the commercial breaks of the Champions League semi final last night (tough luck Didier, Ashley and Roman – it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of guys) made me wonder whether shedloads of precious marketing budgets are being wasted.

Take the Heineken spot, for example. This features a bunch of youths generally grooving around and texting each other – because texting is what the happening youth does these days, according to the bloke in planning – sending messages such as ‘Come on over if you  fancy a Heineken!’ Tragic really. When was the last time any youth tried to entice a mate over with the prospect of ‘a Heineken’? And then you get a load of operatic singers in a pool singing the UEFA theme. Really surreal. 

I’m probably resistant because I’m not a UK lager drinker – for a number of reasons. The main one is that British lager is the product of a grim industrial process; the best thing you can say about the product is that it’s wet and it’s got alcohol in it. The fact that you can usually buy gallons of the stuff for £9.99 at your local supermarket tells you all you need to know about its inherent value.  

But this kind of material makes an old fart like me yearn for the ‘Reaches the parts that other beers cannot reach…’ campaign, or some Carling Black Label Dambusters stuff. Knowing ad people are now shaking their heads at my naivety.

The problem is caused by the harsh efficiencies of global product marketing. These days, big international brands like Heineken have to produce ads that will be shown all over the place. Pan-European, even pan-global.  The result is a dull, lowest common denominator approach where everyone has to be kept happy. It’s bland and forgettable, just like the product. There may be a few saddo youths in Macedonia who think that the UEFA Heineken ad is the coolest thing they’ve ever watched, and are so moved to action that they instantly go out to throw six pints down their neck, but I doubt it. (I’ll probably now get an angry email from the research organisation that tested it to destruction on lager-swilling 18-25s from Barking to Burkina Faso. But research has always been the death of a good idea. That’s another story.) 

The one exception to this reign of mediocrity is the utterly brilliant Meerkat ad for Comparethemarket.com (which is much more entertaining than watching Chelsea). This is clever, highly effective advertising at its very best – I still snigger on the twelfth occasion I’ve watched it. But I don’t just gladly accept a free laugh; I remember why. The branding is so good you instantly remember the name of an otherwise completely tedious price comparison website fighting hard for recognition against Moneysupermarket.com and all the rest. I even used it when trying to research car insurance. And they have produced a very amusing meerkat site, www.comparethemeerkat.com, which is good for a quick giggle over your lunchtime sandwich.

It’s so good they’ve even whipped up a story carried by the BBC (and probably the subject of millions of hits) about why meerkats don’t make good pets. Having spent several Sunday mornings recently watching these weird critters in the local zoo, I suspect that advice is entirely accurate. They’re so hyper they need to watch a few lager ads to calm them down. 



In today's bulletin:

Barclays bounces but Lloyds still a loser
Unilever profits hit by cheapskate shoppers
Editor's blog: Advertising in a global meerkat
'Patronising' Branson ad leaves Virgin staff steaming
The dangers of office politeness

Published May 07 2009, 11:01 AM by matthew gwyther

All Comments

Paul Ashby May 7, 2009
May I ask where your Editor has been for the last few months? Isn't he aware that Advertising Age has just claimed that we are living in the "Post-advertising age"! Forget all the talk of post-recession rebuilding. We are still advertising with no accountability and must now reduce our expectations The coming nonsense is that when this recession is over, countries such as America & Britain should seek and find our salvation in (in what will become a buzz phrase of 2009-10) a "new Marketing model". Wrong. Actually we're just stuffed. Marketing & Advertising hit a tree. There is no replacement advertising model for us to drive off in. We must bash out the dents, clear the broken glass, remove the bumper from the front wheel, and limp on as best we can. We should accommodate ourselves to that prospect Instead, as our prosperity sinks, the Marketing gurus rhetoric will go skyward. "New challenges", "a new vision", "post-millennial economy", "thinking outside the box" ... "new technology" how wearisome this inspirational PowerPoint pap becomes. Already I can hear the so-called great and the good of the (failed) Marketing & Advertising community boasting of the next generation of marketing thrust. Melancholy will be the spectacle of a range of middle-aged-to-elderly marketing & advertising throwbacks burbling about life changes and sea changes and gear changes and step changes for American & British Marketing. "Post-recession Britain ... new age ... new marketing dispensation ... recalibrate ... re-balance ... blah, blah, blah." Oh boy, is this nonsense going to sound wise. The riff will be that Western Marketing, like America & Britain's must reinvent themselves. Behind the curve, and banging the table as ever, they all have not yet latched on to the rhetoric of the "new economic model". They are still trying to kick life back into the old one. So the talk until recently has been about "kick-starting" the old economy. This mindless attempt to return to routine is an indication either of the absence of imagination, or of panic. But as it becomes apparent even to the Marketing & Advertising community that there is to be no return to that golden decade of no hard choices and uninterrupted growth together with Top Down Management techniques that have failed miserably. Although (the argument will concede) the old rust-belt industries of the 20th century had to go, the West turned its back on industry rather too readily. We were bedazzled by Marketing services: fool's gold from Mad Ave & Soho. We need (wait for it) a new Marketing model. First, we must (argh) "rebalance" our economy. Media Agencies must seek out (key words) "a new generation" of shiny new media strengths, a second-wave advertising renaissance. What, then, are these strengths? Our talent (runs the argument) for (key word) "innovation"; an "IT" (key word) generation; the potential of our existing (key word) "creative" agencies and (key words) "high added-value" marketing activity; and our (key words) "genius for invention". Vital to all this will be (key words) "skills", "training" and "education". We should remind ourselves, too, of that inestimable resource available to our economy: English as a (key words) "world language". And it will all be just so much hot air. What is it, precisely, that we do so much better than any other country, althought I must admit that all the trade magazines say at one time or another that " American & British Advertising is the best in the world". Whatever that means! This recession is not a failure of market economics. It is a reassertion of market economics after a decade in which we paid ourselves more than we were producing, and funded it precariously and temporarily, together with a total lack of accountability so that it took a while for the market to rumble. Now a prosperity that always baffled ordinary citizens has collapsed. The collapse of confidence is not irrational; it's the correction to a long run of irrational confidence. All that stuff about the emerging Asian giants wasn't just phrasemaking for party conference speeches. It was true. We're falling behind. We face a mountain of debt: the difference between the life we are able to sustain and the life we were enjoying. Marketing people, having misled the customers for so long must now explain a reduction in their standard of living. The great task facing the next generation of Top-Down Management is to help the country to recognise and embrace its fate: that we should get poorer, and slip with as good a grace as possible into the world's second league. Yes, there is a rebalancing required: a rebalancing of popular expectation. "Television killed advertising" here I detail just how much more effective interactive communication is when compared to conventional advertising and details the results of a research investment in excess of £5 m. Having invested over $10 million in independent research, Paul Ashby is ideally suited to present the case for the widespread use of interactive marketing communication. The research investment has proved conclusively that one exposure to an interactive "event" is far more effective in all key measurements, than traditional advertising. Paul made this investment because has established that Interactive Communication, properly executed, can be totally accountable, unlike all forms of advertising! You can contact Paul at: paul.ashby@yahoo.com Discover more on http://interactivetelevisionorinteractivetv.blogspot.com
Tom Wright May 7, 2009
Struggling to work out which one is the comment and which one is the article. . . . And with the apocalyptic nature of (what I assume is) the comment. Standards of living are not going to collapse overnight. Asian production cannot continue at the same pace without Western consumption. There is ebb and flow, not just ebb. Yes, we spent more than we had at a state and personal level. Ask yourself who is owed the money, and apply the following maxim: If I owe the bank £10, I have a problem. If I owe the bank £10m, they have a problem. If China owns American debt, China has a very big problem indeed; our global competitors have agreed a non-sensical exchange rate which makes them just as stupid as us.
andrew weir May 7, 2009
Like Tom, after Paul's comments I'd almost forgotten what this was about. Oh yes, mediocre ads. In my view advertising is only part of it. Brands need to also get much better at delivering great brand experiences that delight their consumers. Good advertising may stimulate action (sell self) but winning brands go beyond that and find ways to delight buyers by showing they value and care for their consumers. I go on about it here: brandexeriencematters.blogspot.com
James Taylor (Web Ed) May 7, 2009
Paul - thanks for your contribution, but we'd appreciate it if you didn't use this discussion board for naked self-promotion. I'm afraid we're going to have to take down any such comments, because it puts other people off getting involved in the debate. Thanks, James (Web Ed)
James Taylor (Web Ed) May 7, 2009
NB. Of course we don't mind people linking to their own blogs etc (Andrew, are you missing a 'p' in there?)
 
 

Latest jobs

  • No jobs available at the moment