Blogs

Editor's Blog

MT editor Matthew Gwyther's take on the burning business issues of the day.

Editor's blog: Twitter? Twaddle, Part Two   

I did warn readers that my last attack on the ludicrous Twitter twaddle wouldn’t be my last.  Well, two pieces of news give me a chance to return to the fray and toss more ordure in the Twits’ general direction. Firstly, there’s the hilarious outburst from Kanye West, reacting to the news that an imposter has been posing as Himself on Twitter.

Yes, someone on Twitter has been taking the great Kanye in vain, posting the usual moronic 140 character updates. And he’s so pi**ed that he’s posted a rant on his own website with the caps lock on. Amid the narcissisms and expletives you’d expect, West wisely declares, ‘EVERYTHING THAT TWITTER OFFERS, I NEED LESS OF’. There are just better things to do with one’s time – ‘I’M TOO BUSY ACTUALLY BUSY (sic) BEING CREATIVE MOST OF THE TIME AND IF I’M NOT AND I’M JUST LAYING ON THE BEACH I WOULDN’T TELL THE WORLD.’

I feel you, Kanye, as they say in ‘The Wire’. Too much data, too many worthless opinions, too little insight. We’re being engulfed in a digital Tsunami of useless noise. The simple babblings of a two-year-old learning to speak are charming for its parents but do not require broadcasting to the world. Indeed, a little ‘hush now’ wouldn’t go amiss. I think this is what the saintly Maureen Dowd of the New York Times was hinting at recently when she dared to suggest: ‘I would rather be tied up to stakes in the Kalahari desert, have honey poured over me and red ants eat out my eyes than open a Twitter account.’

Which gets me onto reason two. This is the hot news that the government has hired a Twitter Czar (Nero and fiddling, deckchairs and the Titanic, all come to mind). Andrew Stott is to be made the UK’s first director of digital engagement (and he’ll have no need to fiddle his expenses – he’s getting paid an exorbitant £160,000). You couldn’t make it up, could you? Maybe this means Andrew will be given the ticklish job of masterminding the PM’s next appearance on YouTube. The first, you will recall, plumbed new depths of the gruesome as Gordon was told to try ‘smiling with sincerity’. What came out was something truly ghoulish, as if Tim Burton had been given the director’s gig. If Mr Stott wants something valuable to do in the digital arena, why not start with trying to work out how the government blew all those billions on the failed NHS IT system?

I got a minion to check out Andy Stott on Twitter, and apparently he was: ‘Sat in the office doing nothing. Joy.’ (A typically helpful and enlightening Twit.)  Maybe this isn’t the right Andy Stott, and merely a Kanye West-style vile impersonation. Who knows and, indeed, who cares? Actually, it must be another Stott – because the Twitter Czar will undoubtedly have been attending numerous high-level meetings in Whitehall with his two Blackberries and GCHQ-approved laptop, discussing digital engagement and how to get down politically with the youth. Going forward. Lord give us strength.



In today's bulletin:

Never mind our expenses, what about your bonuses?
John Lewis figures supported by new knickers
Editor's blog: Twitter? Twaddle, Part Two
Want to be an entrepreneur? Move to Scarborough
Cutting your expenses, with YouTube

Published May 15 2009, 11:23 AM by matthew gwyther

All Comments

2078859 May 15, 2009
Andy's at @DirDigEng and wouldn't you love 700 congratulations and a ready community to support you on your first day in a new role? If not, and if you don't get it, just don't use it. Simple. But don't you think it's about time you just let the rest of us get on and gain the benefits we clearly think we're enjoying from using it? Jon Ingham @joningham
Jonathan Goodacre May 18, 2009
More sense in 140 characters than in the Editor's Blog unfortunately. The main point of Twitter is the way it integrates with other platforms. Don't like it don't use it.
Elise Reynolds October 4, 2009
After reading 'MT Expert's Ten Top Tips: Leading in an age of mass collaboration' I was moved to return to the Editor's Blog archives to see how Matthew Gwyther had responded to the many lucid comments from readers to his 'Twitter Twaddle' - the Top Ten article lands firmly on their side and against the idea that Twitter is Twaddle. But this Part Two blog completely fails to address those comments. Is he so stuck to his shortsighted opinion that he cannot bear to alter it in any way, even in the face of so much Non-Twaddle Sense?
James Taylor (Web Ed) October 5, 2009
Elise - I think Matthew's going to be hard to convince on the Twitter front. But we're working on him - and besides, wouldn't life be boring if everyone had the same opinion on everything... Twitter's not exactly short of advocates!
Elise Reynolds October 6, 2009
You're right James, I've probably been intrigued by his blogs on this precisely because it's an unusual stance. He is so vocal and eloquent on the subject (ok, any subject) that I was looking forward to his next stab at countering all the twitter sense...but found this disappointing. Ah well, maybe yet to come.
James Taylor (Web Ed) October 6, 2009
Hi Elise - well maybe I can persuade him to have another stab when he gets back from his hols - assuming he hasn't been scared off by the reception the last one got!
 
 

Latest jobs

  • No jobs available at the moment