Blogs

Secret Diary of an Entrepreneur

A London-based entrepreneur blogs for MT on life as a small business owner.

Secret Diary of an Entrepreneur: Interview trial and error    

Sometimes you need to start interviewing people to work out who you want. Though girls are tricky…

I interviewed my first potential COO this week. To be honest I was slightly bounced into it by that recruitment agent I met a while back, given that I haven't totally decided what the profile should be yet. Then again, I figured seeing someone would actually help on that score - I quite often use a recruitment process to work out exactly what I want. (I imagine this isn't exactly best practice, and I suspect my HR woman would probably have a coronary if she knew. But what the heck).

So there I was, on Tuesday, interviewing this girl. I have to admit, she started at a fairly major disadvantage being from a recruitment agency. I do try to ignore it; to tell myself that the important thing is getting the right person for the job, whatever it takes. But it's quite hard not to think about the fact that hiring this person would cost me some exorbitant five-figure sum, to be paid in full within thirty days of her joining. Just what my cashflow doesn't need at the moment. The result is that I can't look at her without seeing pound signs flicker across her forehead. It's a bit like looking at a chocolate bar in a vending machine.

Anyway, she was actually very nice, this girl. We had lots in common - we're from the same neck of the woods, we went to university around the same time and did quite similar courses, and we took the same sort of graduate job. She's currently working at a start-up that's apparently about to get dumped by its venture backers, so everyone's bailing out as fast as they can. So if nothing else, this allowed me to pat myself on the back for not taking that VC cash a couple of years ago (at the time I couldn't move for VCs offering me money, along with grandiose promises of high-profile non-execs and wholly unnecessary perks - they seem to have gone quiet lately, believe it or not).

But I had a couple of other concerns, as well as the cash thing. We got on like a house of fire, but I worried afterwards whether that meant we might be a bit too similar. If I'm going to hire into the senior management team, it would be useful to get someone who can offer something a bit different. A girl would actually be good, just to balance out the raging balls of testosterone that are Ace and Mammon. But not one that’s just like me, perhaps.

Secondly, the big difference between me and this girl was that although we're about the same age, she's been married for three years (she brought this up, I hasten to add, I didn't ask – I’ve learned my lesson from last time). And inevitably, that makes me worry about babies. I know you’re not supposed to admit to this sort of thing these days, but hey, there's got to be some advantage to having an anonymous blog. Let's be honest: maternity leave is a serious pain in the proverbial for a business this size (and even more so for smaller businesses, of course). I can’t afford to hire a senior person on a big salary and then have her disappear for an indefinite period, forcing me to do this whole process again and find someone else to do the job on a short term basis. It’ll just mean more work for me, which is precisely the opposite of what this appointment is supposed to achieve.

So for all three reasons, I think she’s probably a No. Though as you can imagine, I’ll be largely focusing on the second reason when I give my feedback.

Published Mar 11 2010, 06:30 PM by Secret Diary

All Comments

Hannah Watson March 12, 2010

The attitude of not hiring women because they 'might' go on maternity leave is nothing new and I imagine, very common among small business owners.

I work for a smaller firm and told my boss last week I was expecting my first child. I've been with the company for eight years and I had fully intended to return, however, his reaction has made me question whether or not this will be possible for me.

I fully believe I could successfully take him to a tribunal and I would, if it wasn't for the fact that in a year's time I will now have to look for a new job and I'm worried about a potential new employers reaction to this.

I have offered to find cover for my leave - interview, recruit and train - on top of my usual responsibilities. As a smaller business, my employer will also be given compensation from the Government while I'm off, so I fail to see how the attitude of 'don't hire women who might get pregnant' can truly be justified.

I would say at least you've been honest and admitted you wouldn't hire someone who may go on maternity leave, but as you say, this blog is  anonymous.

Secret Diary March 16, 2010

Hi Hannah - I don't like the idea of not hiring someone in case they went on maternity leave. And to be honest I'm not sure I'd reject someone on this basis, if they were perfect in every other way. I think your idea to find and train a replacement is a great one - it's going through this whole process twice that horrifies me.

That said, if you've been there for eight years i think it's a very different story - I think you've earned a bit more slack than this. So don't be shy about taking it further.

 
 

Latest jobs

  • No jobs available at the moment